Welcome to the Treehouse Community

Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.

Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.

Start your free trial

Digital Literacy

Why did you not mention any of the Microsoft Software and applications as examples?

Why did you not mention any of the Microsoft Software and applications as examples in the videos - Fundamental of Computer Languages, What Some Common Languages Do and How They Work Together, Programming Paradigms? Are they not good programming languages as well or taught at Treehouse?

Simon Coates
Simon Coates
28,694 Points

The course is https://teamtreehouse.com/library/computer-basics and the question is about 2 videos under the computer languages topic.

2 Answers

Jennifer Nordell
seal-mask
STAFF
.a{fill-rule:evenodd;}techdegree
Jennifer Nordell
Treehouse Teacher

You ask about why Microsoft applications aren't used as an example. But an application is not a programming language. An application is written in a programming language. And some of the programming languages mentioned are not operating system dependent such as Java and JavaScript. However, if you take the newly opened Game Development track and the C# modules as well you'll be learning C# which is Microsoft's native programming language. Hope this helps! :sparkles:

Just wondering why Ruby, Java, Swift and others were mentioned and C# for example was not mentioned as an example of a programming language!

Jennifer Nordell
seal-mask
.a{fill-rule:evenodd;}techdegree
Jennifer Nordell
Treehouse Teacher

No idea. You'd have to ask the staff. I agree that it should have probably been on the list somewhere.